top of page

I’ve Reserved Judgement on AI Until Now - Here’s What I Think It Brings to the Table

  • Writer: Stuart Kirk
    Stuart Kirk
  • Jun 10
  • 4 min read
I’ll be honest - I’ve reserved judgement on AI in graphic design up until now.

Like a lot of creatives, I’ve watched it appear everywhere almost overnight. One minute it was a novelty, the next it was being spoken about like it could replace entire creative departments before lunchtime.

But after spending time with it, testing it, questioning it, and looking at where it actually fits into the design process, I think there is a more useful conversation to be had.

Before I go any further, it is probably worth being honest...

I’m not a columnist or a journalist. I’m a graphic designer (...and very passionate one at that) And yes, this article was written with the help of AI.

Which feels fitting, really.

The thoughts are mine. The experience is mine. The judgement is mine. But I’ve used AI here in the same way I think it can be useful in design - to help shape ideas, organise thoughts and get the direction clearer, faster.

AI is not a replacement for good design. It is not a magic button for building a proper brand. And it certainly does not understand your business, your customers, your values or the finer details that make a visual identity work.

But it can bring something useful to the table.

For me, one of the biggest benefits is quick visualisation. At the early stage of a project, AI can help turn basic ideas into visual starting points. Not finished artwork. Not final logos. Not polished brand systems. More like a digital sketchpad - a way to quickly explore mood, direction, colour, layout and overall feel.

In a way, it reminds me of the shift from traditional film photography to digital photography.

There was a time when you could spend hours in a dimly lit darkroom developing shots, only to find out later that half of them were out of focus, badly centred or not quite what you had hoped for. There was skill in that process, of course. There was patience, craft and a real understanding of the medium.

But digital photography changed the workflow.

It did not remove the need for a good eye. It did not replace composition, timing, lighting or instinct. What it did was speed up the feedback. You could see what was working sooner. You could adjust. You could experiment. You could stop wasting time developing the wrong shot.

That is where I think AI has a useful place in design.

It gives us faster feedback at the idea stage.

Quite often, a client knows they need a new logo, brand, website graphic or piece of marketing material, but they are not always sure what direction they want to take. They might know what they like when they see it, or what they definitely do not like, but getting to that point can take time.

And time is money.

Used properly, AI can help reduce that early uncertainty. It allows rough ideas to be explored quicker, helping both designer and client understand the direction before too much time is spent polishing the wrong route.

It means more focus and less faff.

Rather than going round in circles trying to describe a style, we can quickly test a few visual directions. Is the brand bold and energetic? Clean and minimal? Traditional and trustworthy? Premium and refined? Playful and illustrated? AI can help open up that conversation faster.

But this is where the important part comes in.

AI can generate options, but it does not know which option is right.

That still needs human judgement. It needs experience. It needs an understanding of typography, layout, colour, brand consistency, print production, signage, web use and how a design will actually work in the real world.

A generated image might look impressive at first glance, but a brand needs more than a nice visual. It needs structure. It needs purpose. It needs to be usable across everything from a business card to a van graphic, a website header, a social post, a shop sign or a full product range.

That is where the designer still matters.

Just like digital photography did not kill photography, AI does not kill design. It changes part of the process. It helps us see faster, test faster and make decisions with more clarity.

The camera still needs a photographer.

The brand still needs a designer.

So, my view on AI is this: it is a useful tool when it helps speed up the early thinking, sharpen the brief and give clients a clearer sense of direction. It can help get ideas moving. It can save time. It can make the process feel more visual from the start.

But it is not the final answer.

The real value still comes from knowing what to do with those ideas, how to refine them, and how to turn them into something that genuinely works for the business.

And in the spirit of full honesty, this article itself proves the point.

It was shaped with the help of AI - but the opinion, experience and final judgement are human.

That, to me, is where the balance sits.

AI can help put ideas on the table.

Good design still decides what stays there.




POWER

TO THE

PEOPLE!

Comments


bottom of page